As Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor submitted her letter of retirement today, so begins a battle of worldviews we all saw coming. Though it was somewhat unexpected that Justice O’Connor would be the first to retire on the current court, it was expected that a retirement would come within the year.
Justice O’Connor was appointed by President Reagan in the early 1980’s, politically leaning to the right, but predominantly a centrist. The only reason I mention that is to make the point that the impending battle for confirming the next Supreme Court Justice has become more about politics than interpreting the law.
I am a conservative, evangelical Christian who, in my perfect world, would like to see a conservative leaning court that would uphold my worldview. That being said, I have a problem with all involved in the process focusing so heavily on what a Supreme Court nominees (or any judge for that matter) political views/personal views are on many subjects.
Of course in a perfect world, judges would never inject their personal/political views in the process of making an “unbiased” ruling. But we all know this world is far from perfect and far too many judges try to legislate from the bench rather than interpret the law and Constitution.
We are left with a impending battle of worldviews/morals/ethics. A battle of absolutes vs. everything is grey, right vs. wrong, humble vs. selfish. In the end it seems it will come down to a battle of life vs. murder.(I’m sure you can guess what I think about that.)
My prayer is that what ever side people are on, we can respect each other though we may disagree. I’m sure I’ll be writing more on this topic as the confirmation process begins.